Theodore Roosevelt (R) in a letter to the American Defense Society ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quoteteddy roosevelt immigration quote
On Wednesday, CNN’s Jim Acosta took White House abettor Stephen Miller to assignment for Admiral Trump’s proposed clearing action reform, which seeks to convention a “merit-based arrangement for blooming cards based on the adeptness to allege English, educational accomplishment and job skills.”
["931.2"]
Found this quote by Teddy Roosevelt on immigration : pics | teddy roosevelt immigration quoteRather than adduce any acknowledged or bread-and-butter problems with Trump’s proposed policy, Acosta invoked the “American attitude back it comes to immigration. The Statue of Liberty says, “Give me your tired, your poor, your awash masses.”
Trump’s proposed clearing ameliorate is amiss back beheld through the prism of “American tradition,” Acosta suggests. And his abutment for that position is not that Trump’s action runs afield of the Constitution or any absolute laws, but rather because it seems ideologically at allowance with a poem, accounting by a late-nineteenth aeon left-wing called Emma Lazarus, which he believes is a basic litmus analysis in free what is, and what isn’t, absolutely American back it comes to clearing policy.
I don’t booty affair with the composition itself. Aesthetically, I’ve consistently anticipation it absolutely good. I aloof anticipate it’s cool to adduce it as “Exhibit A” in arguing that restrictions on clearing aggregate to nativist xenophobia.
Quotes are funny things, because who originally said them about provides the aggregate of a quote’s weight. You’ll agenda that Acosta didn’t say, “As left-wing artist Emma Lazarus already wrote…” He said that “[t]he Statue of Liberty says…”
But let’s comedy his bold for a moment. Acosta acutely had a botheration with the English affirmation of Trump’s action proposition. Well, as Miller acicular out, the adduce was not emblazoned on the Statue of Liberty back it was erected in America in 1886. It was “added later.” It was added in 1903, to be precise.
In 1903, Theodore Roosevelt was the American president. Given this fact, and the actuality that his face appears alongside Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln on Mount Rushmore, I’d say his words adeptness backpack some weight on the aggregate of what is “traditionally” American. And what Roosevelt said about immigrants, and the call of immigrants’ acquirements of the English language, could not be clearer.
“In the aboriginal place,” Roosevelt wrote in 1919, “we should assert that the immigrant who comes actuality in acceptable acceptance becomes an American and assimilates to us… There can be no disconnected adherence here… We accept allowance for but one language, and that is the English language.”
Sounds appealing abutting to what we conservatives are arguing today, doesn’t it? So how is it that Teddy Roosevelt’s words are aloof ancient xenophobic blather, but the words of a 19th aeon socialist, whose few broadly remembered words arise in an exhibition at the abject of the Statue of Liberty, are the accepted by which all things apropos American clearing action should be measured?
["577.15"]
Inspirational Quote of the Day: Theodore Roosevelt on Immigrants ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quoteI could altercate that the adduce I referenced is best in a analytic sense, and I absolutely accept it is. But the absoluteness is that this array of affair may be acceptable chat fodder at a banquet table or amusing gathering, but what Teddy had to say about clearing in 1919, aloof afore his death, is rather extraneous back it comes to the amends of America’s clearing action in 2017. And the appealing musings of a left-wing accept little, if anything, to do with what is “traditionally” American.
Neither should be invoked in honest action altercation about immigration. What should be discussed in such agitation is the bread-and-butter and cultural appulse of the absolute and the proposed policies. And, actuality that it’s amid the few jobs that the federal government is absolutely declared to do, how federal clearing action can best assure American citizens.
Nonetheless, Acosta’s odd achievement fabricated headlines, admitting conceivably not in the way he would’ve liked. Trump supporters appropriately watched as Miller somewhat indelicately dismantled Acosta’s logic. What amuses me most, though, is that so abounding on the larboard anticipate Acosta fabricated a accurate argument, and are claiming that Miller is somehow at accountability for the agrarian exchange. Callum Borchers writes in The Washington Post that “Miller’s abnegation to acknowledgment in an intellectually honest way beatific the question-and-answer affair off the rails.”
But it was Acosta’s asinine framing of the catechism that absolutely led the affair “off the rails.” In truth, the alone bookish bluntness in the barter came from Miller, who reminded Acosta that clearing levels in America accept not consistently been a deluge of poverty-stricken, unskilled laborers with little apperception to digest to American society, but that “immigration levels accept ebbed and flowed” throughout our nation’s history as adeptness confused in Congress and controlling administrations over the years. He additionally reminded him that acquirements English is already a affirmation of naturalization, admitting Acosta’s affirmation that an English affirmation for blooming cards is some berserk racist aberration from continuing laws.
Acosta wasn’t at the White House for an intellectually honest altercation on the dangers or allowances of complete immigration, which should be obvious. His aim, as it is with so abounding added boilerplate media “journalists,” was to arresting his own accelerating virtues and advance the left’s advertising attack to acceptation voters who crave, and will consistently ambition to receive, taxpayer-subsidized benefits, thereby acceptance for added all-embracing advance of the authoritative State, and bringing our nation nearer to the collectivist utopia that they so absurdly endeavor to achieve.
But with no intellectually solid foundation aloft which to angle in authoritative the altercation for complete immigration, it adeptness be barefaced that Jim Acosta and his ilk’s best altercation today boils bottomward to “a applique at the abject of the Statue of Liberty says...”
Hard to anticipate of a bigger emblematic appliance of the idiom, “grasping at straws.”
William Sullivan blogs at Political Palaver and can be followed on Twitter.
On Wednesday, CNN’s Jim Acosta took White House abettor Stephen Miller to assignment for Admiral Trump’s proposed clearing action reform, which seeks to convention a “merit-based arrangement for blooming cards based on the adeptness to allege English, educational accomplishment and job skills.”
["421.95"]
Teddy Roosevelt Quotes immigration ~ Top Ten Quotes | teddy roosevelt immigration quoteRather than adduce any acknowledged or bread-and-butter problems with Trump’s proposed policy, Acosta invoked the “American attitude back it comes to immigration. The Statue of Liberty says, “Give me your tired, your poor, your awash masses.”
Trump’s proposed clearing ameliorate is amiss back beheld through the prism of “American tradition,” Acosta suggests. And his abutment for that position is not that Trump’s action runs afield of the Constitution or any absolute laws, but rather because it seems ideologically at allowance with a poem, accounting by a late-nineteenth aeon left-wing called Emma Lazarus, which he believes is a basic litmus analysis in free what is, and what isn’t, absolutely American back it comes to clearing policy.
I don’t booty affair with the composition itself. Aesthetically, I’ve consistently anticipation it absolutely good. I aloof anticipate it’s cool to adduce it as “Exhibit A” in arguing that restrictions on clearing aggregate to nativist xenophobia.
Quotes are funny things, because who originally said them about provides the aggregate of a quote’s weight. You’ll agenda that Acosta didn’t say, “As left-wing artist Emma Lazarus already wrote…” He said that “[t]he Statue of Liberty says…”
But let’s comedy his bold for a moment. Acosta acutely had a botheration with the English affirmation of Trump’s action proposition. Well, as Miller acicular out, the adduce was not emblazoned on the Statue of Liberty back it was erected in America in 1886. It was “added later.” It was added in 1903, to be precise.
In 1903, Theodore Roosevelt was the American president. Given this fact, and the actuality that his face appears alongside Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln on Mount Rushmore, I’d say his words adeptness backpack some weight on the aggregate of what is “traditionally” American. And what Roosevelt said about immigrants, and the call of immigrants’ acquirements of the English language, could not be clearer.
“In the aboriginal place,” Roosevelt wrote in 1919, “we should assert that the immigrant who comes actuality in acceptable acceptance becomes an American and assimilates to us… There can be no disconnected adherence here… We accept allowance for but one language, and that is the English language.”
Sounds appealing abutting to what we conservatives are arguing today, doesn’t it? So how is it that Teddy Roosevelt’s words are aloof ancient xenophobic blather, but the words of a 19th aeon socialist, whose few broadly remembered words arise in an exhibition at the abject of the Statue of Liberty, are the accepted by which all things apropos American clearing action should be measured?
["921.5"]
Teddy Roosevelt Has The Perfect Answer For Today's Muslim Migrant ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quoteI could altercate that the adduce I referenced is best in a analytic sense, and I absolutely accept it is. But the absoluteness is that this array of affair may be acceptable chat fodder at a banquet table or amusing gathering, but what Teddy had to say about clearing in 1919, aloof afore his death, is rather extraneous back it comes to the amends of America’s clearing action in 2017. And the appealing musings of a left-wing accept little, if anything, to do with what is “traditionally” American.
Neither should be invoked in honest action altercation about immigration. What should be discussed in such agitation is the bread-and-butter and cultural appulse of the absolute and the proposed policies. And, actuality that it’s amid the few jobs that the federal government is absolutely declared to do, how federal clearing action can best assure American citizens.
Nonetheless, Acosta’s odd achievement fabricated headlines, admitting conceivably not in the way he would’ve liked. Trump supporters appropriately watched as Miller somewhat indelicately dismantled Acosta’s logic. What amuses me most, though, is that so abounding on the larboard anticipate Acosta fabricated a accurate argument, and are claiming that Miller is somehow at accountability for the agrarian exchange. Callum Borchers writes in The Washington Post that “Miller’s abnegation to acknowledgment in an intellectually honest way beatific the question-and-answer affair off the rails.”
But it was Acosta’s asinine framing of the catechism that absolutely led the affair “off the rails.” In truth, the alone bookish bluntness in the barter came from Miller, who reminded Acosta that clearing levels in America accept not consistently been a deluge of poverty-stricken, unskilled laborers with little apperception to digest to American society, but that “immigration levels accept ebbed and flowed” throughout our nation’s history as adeptness confused in Congress and controlling administrations over the years. He additionally reminded him that acquirements English is already a affirmation of naturalization, admitting Acosta’s affirmation that an English affirmation for blooming cards is some berserk racist aberration from continuing laws.
Acosta wasn’t at the White House for an intellectually honest altercation on the dangers or allowances of complete immigration, which should be obvious. His aim, as it is with so abounding added boilerplate media “journalists,” was to arresting his own accelerating virtues and advance the left’s advertising attack to acceptation voters who crave, and will consistently ambition to receive, taxpayer-subsidized benefits, thereby acceptance for added all-embracing advance of the authoritative State, and bringing our nation nearer to the collectivist utopia that they so absurdly endeavor to achieve.
But with no intellectually solid foundation aloft which to angle in authoritative the altercation for complete immigration, it adeptness be barefaced that Jim Acosta and his ilk’s best altercation today boils bottomward to “a applique at the abject of the Statue of Liberty says...”
Hard to anticipate of a bigger emblematic appliance of the idiom, “grasping at straws.”
William Sullivan blogs at Political Palaver and can be followed on Twitter.
["1986.56"]
and calling someone an african american is ludicrous to say the ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["291"]
Theodore Roosevelt quotes critic Images HD | Famous Theodore ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["1157.21"]
Teddy Roosevelt Quote 15 on the things that will destroy America ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["380.24"]
Theodore Roosevelt | District of Calamity | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["824.5"]
Theodore Roosevelt quote: Every immigrant who comes here should be ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["1241.6"]
Teddy Roosevelt, Immigration, and Linguistic discrimination - YouTube | teddy roosevelt immigration quote["485"]
Theodore Roosevelt | Great Quotes from Great People | Pinterest ... | teddy roosevelt immigration quote