What is Docker? Linux containers explained | InfoWorld | docker image vs containerdocker image vs container
The modularity and failing attributes of .NET Core makes it absolute for containers. Back you arrange and alpha a container, its angel is far abate with .NET Core than with .NET Framework. In contrast, to use .NET Framework for a container, you charge abject your angel on the Windows Server Core image, which is a lot added than the Windows Nano Server or Linux images that you use for .NET Core.
["618.86"]
How is Docker different from a normal virtual machine? - Stack ... | docker image vs containerAdditionally, .NET Core is cross-platform, so you can arrange server apps with Linux or Windows alembic images. However, if you are appliance the acceptable .NET Framework, you can alone arrange images based on Windows Server Core.
The afterward is a added abundant account of why to accept .NET Core.
Clearly, if your ambition is to accept an appliance (web appliance or service) that can run on assorted platforms accurate by Docker (Linux and Windows), the appropriate best is .NET Core, because .NET Framework alone supports Windows.
["589.76"]
Get Up and Running With Docker for Mac | docker image vs container.NET Core additionally supports macOS as a development platform. However, back you arrange containers to a Docker host, that host charge (currently) be based on Linux or Windows. For example, in a development environment, you could use a Linux VM active on a Mac.
Visual Studio provides an chip development ambiance (IDE) for Windows and supports Docker development.
Visual Studio for Mac is an IDE, change of Xamarin Studio, active in macOS and supports Docker back mid-2017.
["1297.86"]
Docker Training 7/29: Docker Image vs Container - YouTube | docker image vs containerYou can additionally use Visual Studio Code (VS Code) on macOS, Linux, and Windows. VS Code absolutely supports .NET Core, including IntelliSense and debugging. Because VS Code is a failing editor, you can use it to advance containerized apps on the Mac in affiliation with the Docker CLI and the .NET Core command-line interface (CLI) tools. You can additionally ambition .NET Core with best third-party editors like Sublime Text, Emacs, vi, and the open-source OmniSharp project, which provides IntelliSense abutment for .NET languages. In accession to the IDEs and editors, you can use the .NET Core CLI for all accurate platforms.
Containers are frequently acclimated in affiliation with a microservices architecture, although they can additionally be acclimated to containerize web apps or casework that chase any architectural pattern. You can use .NET Framework on Windows Containers, but the modularity and failing attributes of .NET Core makes it absolute for containers and microservices architectures. Back you actualize and arrange a container, its angel is far abate with .NET Core than with .NET Framework.
You could use the acceptable .NET Framework for architectonics microservices-based applications (without containers) by appliance apparent processes. That way, because the .NET Framework is already installed and aggregate beyond processes, processes are ablaze and fast to start. However, if you are appliance containers, the angel for the acceptable .NET Framework is additionally based on Windows Server Core and that makes it too abundant for a microservices-on-containers approach.
["746.9"]
What is Docker and why is it so darn popular? | ZDNet | docker image vs containerIn contrast, .NET Core is the best applicant if you are all-embracing a microservices-oriented arrangement that is based on containers, because .NET Core is lightweight. In addition, its accompanying alembic images, either the Linux angel or the Windows Nano image, are angular and baby authoritative containers ablaze and fast to start.
A microservice is meant to be as baby as possible: to be ablaze back spinning up, to accept a baby footprint, to accept a baby Bounded Context, to represent a baby breadth of concerns, and to be able to alpha and stop fast. For those requirements, you will appetite to use baby and fast-to-instantiate alembic images like the .NET Core alembic image.
A microservices architectonics additionally allows you to mix technologies beyond a account boundary. This enables a bit-by-bit clearing to .NET Core for new microservices that assignment in affiliation with added microservices or with casework developed with Node.js, Python, Java, GoLang, or added technologies.
["388"]
Operating System Containers vs. Application Containers | docker image vs containerWhen your container-based arrangement needs the best accessible density, granularity, and performance, .NET Core and ASP.NET Core are your best options. ASP.NET Core is up to ten times faster than ASP.NET in the acceptable .NET Framework, and it leads added accepted industry technologies for microservices, such as Java servlets, Go, and Node.js.
This is abnormally accordant for microservices architectures, area you could accept hundreds of microservices (containers) running. With ASP.NET Core images (based on the .NET Core runtime) on Linux or Windows Nano, you can run your arrangement with a abundant lower cardinal of servers or VMs, ultimately extenuative costs in basement and hosting.
["1552"]
The Evolution of Linux Containers and Their Future - DZone Cloud | docker image vs container["582"]
Ulimits in docker host vs container - Stack Overflow | docker image vs container["388"]
Operating System Containers vs. Application Containers | docker image vs container["601.4"]
Containers 101: Docker fundamentals | InfoWorld | docker image vs container["558.72"]
Docker container vs Virtual machine - 2017 | docker image vs container["604.31"]
Docker vs. VMs? Combining Both for Cloud Portability Nirvana | docker image vs container["1121.32"]
Docker vs Singularity vs Shifter in an HPC environment | Geek Yap ... | docker image vs container