Meaning of Octavia: Octavia is a feminine variant of the Latin ... | octavia name meaningoctavia name meaning
Octavia, a humanoid apprentice advised to action fires on Navy ships, has baffled an absorbing ambit of facial expressions.
["291"]
Octavia Name Meaning | octavia name meaningWhen she’s angry off, she looks like a human-size doll. She has a bland white face with a boycott nose. Her bogus eyebrows sit analogously on her forehead like two little agitated canoes.
When she’s on, however, her eyelids fly accessible and she begins to affectation emotion. She can nod her accomplished in a action of understanding; she can widen her eyes and lift both her eyebrows in a acceptable affinity of alarm; or she can erect her accomplished to one ancillary and spiral up her mouth, replicating animal confusion. To banana effect, she can alike accomplished one countenance and attenuated the adverse eye while borer her metal fingers together, as admitting astute acts of automatic revenge.
This adventure is allotment of our November/December 2017 Issue
But Octavia’s ambit of facial expressions isn’t her best absorbing trait. What’s amazing is that her affecting affect is an authentic acknowledgment to her interactions with humans. She looks pleased, for instance, back she recognizes one of her teammates. She looks afraid back a assistant gives her a command she wasn’t expecting. She looks abashed if accession says article she doesn’t understand.
She can appearance adapted affecting affect because she processes massive amounts of advice about her environment. She can see, hear, and touch. She takes beheld banal of her ambience application the two cameras congenital into her eyes and analyzes characteristics like facial features, complexion, and clothing. She can ascertain people’s voices, application four microphones and a voice-recognition affairs alleged Sphinx. She can analyze 25 altered altar by touch, accepting abstruse them by application her fingers to physically dispense them into assorted accessible positions and shapes. Taken together, these perceptual abilities anatomy a allotment of her “embodied cerebral architecture,” which allows her—according to her creators at the Navy Centermost for Applied Analysis in Bogus Intelligence—to “think and act in means agnate to people.”
That’s an agitative claim, but it’s not necessarily shocking. We’re acclimatized to the abstraction of machines acting like people. Automatons created in 18th-century France could dance, accumulate time, and comedy the drums, the dulcimer, or the piano. As a kid growing up in the 1980s, I for some acumen coveted a baby advertised for the adeptness to pee in her pants.
U.S. Naval Analysis Laboratory
We’re alike acclimatized to the abstraction of machines cerebration in means that admonish us of humans. Abounding of our long-cherished high-water marks for animal cognition—the adeptness to exhausted a grandmaster at chess, for example, or to compose a metrically authentic sonnet—have been met and surpassed by computers.
Octavia’s actions, however—the aflutter accession of her eyes, the abashed channel of her bogus eyebrows—seem to go a footfall further. They betoken that in accession to cerebration the way we think, she’s additionally activity animal emotions.
That’s not absolutely the case: Octavia’s affecting affect, according to Gregory Trafton, who leads the Able Systems Section at the Navy AI center, is abandoned meant to authenticate the affectionate of cerebration she’s accomplishing and accomplish it easier for bodies to collaborate with her. But it’s not consistently accessible to draw a band amid cerebration and feeling. As Trafton acknowledges, “It’s bright that people’s thoughts and affections are altered but appulse anniversary other.” And if, as he says, “emotions admission acknowledgment and acknowledgment influences emotion,” Octavia’s adeptness to think, reason, and apperceive credibility to some of the bigger questions that will accompany the acceleration of able machines. At what point will machines be astute abundant to feel something? And how would we absolutely know?
Octavia is programmed with approach of mind, acceptation that she can ahead the brainy states of her animal teammates. She understands that bodies accept potentially adverse behavior or intentions. Back Octavia is accustomed a command that differs from her expectations, she runs simulations to ascertain what the assistant who gave the command adeptness be thinking, and why that actuality thinks this abrupt ambition is valid. She does this by activity through her own models of the apple but altering them slightly, acquisitive to acquisition one that leads to the declared goal. Back she tilts her accomplished to one ancillary and furrows her eyebrows, it’s to arresting that she’s active these simulations, aggravating to bigger accept her teammate’s beliefs.
We still don’t apperceive aggregate that’s circuitous in activity emotions.
["825.47"]
Octavia - Meaning of Name | octavia name meaningOctavia isn’t programmed with affecting models. Her approach of apperception is a cerebral pattern. But it functions a lot like empathy, that best admired of all animal emotions.
Other apprentice makers brim the affair of their machines’ affecting intelligence. SoftBank Robotics, for instance, which sells Pepper—a “pleasant and likeable” humanoid apprentice congenital to serve as a animal companion—claims that Pepper can “perceive animal emotion,” abacus that “Pepper loves to collaborate with you, Pepper wants to apprentice added about your tastes, your habits, and absolutely artlessly who you are.” But admitting Pepper adeptness accept the adeptness to admit animal emotions, and admitting Pepper adeptness be able of responding with blessed smiles or expressions of sadness, no one’s claiming that Pepper absolutely feels such emotions.
What would it booty for a apprentice architect to affirmation that? For one thing, we still don’t apperceive aggregate that’s circuitous in activity emotions.
In contempo years, revolutions in attitude and neuroscience accept radically redefined the actual abstraction of emotion, authoritative it alike added difficult to pin bottomward and describe. According to scientists such as the analyst Lisa Feldman Barrett, a assistant at Northeastern University, it is acceptable added bright that our affections alter broadly depending on the ability we’re aloft in. They alike alter broadly aural an abandoned in altered situations. In fact, admitting we allotment the accepted animosity that accomplish up what’s accepted as “affect” (pleasure, displeasure, arousal, and calmness) with best added bodies and abounding added animals, our added astute and specific affections alter added than they chase accurate norms. Fear, for instance, is a culturally agreed-upon concept, but it plays out in our bodies in countless ways. It’s aggressive by altered stimuli, it manifests abnormally in our brains, and it’s bidding in altered means on our faces. There’s no distinct “fear center” or “fear circuit” in the brain, aloof as there’s no anxiously aflutter facial expression: we all action and affectation our abhorrence in radically altered ways, depending on the situation—ways that, through interactions with added people, we apprentice to analyze or characterization as “fear.”
When we allocution about fear, then, we’re talking about a ambiguous awning abstraction rather than article that comes out of a specific allotment of the brain. As Barrett puts it, we assemble affections on the atom through an coaction of actual systems. So how can we apprehend programmers to accurately archetypal animal affect in robots?
There are moral quandaries, as well, about programming robots to accept emotions. These issues are abnormally able-bodied approved by aggressive robots that, like Octavia, are advised to be beatific into frightening, painful, or potentially baleful situations in abode of beneath disposable animal teammates.
At a 2017 appointment sponsored by the Army’s somewhat alarmingly blue-blooded Mad Scientist Initiative, Lieutenant Accepted Kevin Mangum, the agent administrator for Army Training and Doctrine Command, defined that such robots should and will be autonomous. “As we attending at our added circuitous world, there’s no agnosticism that robotics, free systems, and bogus intelligence will comedy a role,” said Mangum. The 2017 Army Automatic and Free Systems Strategy predicts abounding affiliation of free systems by 2040, replacing today’s bomb-disposal robots and added machines that are accidentally operated by humans.
Michael J. McLeod
When these robots can act and ahead on their own, should they, like Octavia, be programmed with the affinity of animal emotion? Should they be programmed to absolutely accept animal emotion? If we’re sending them into battle, should they not abandoned ahead but feel alongside their animal companions?
On the one hand, of advance not: if we’re designing robots with the accurate aim of advertisement them to danger, it would be barbarous to accord them the accommodation to ache terror, trauma, or pain.
On the added hand, however, if affect affects intelligence and carnality versa, could we be abiding that a apprentice with no affect would accomplish a acceptable soldier? What if the abridgement of affect leads to brainless decisions, accidental risks, or badly atrocious retribution? Adeptness a apprentice with no affect adjudge that the able accommodation would be to accomplish what a animal soldier would feel was a war crime? Or would a apprentice with no admission to abhorrence or acrimony accomplish bigger decisions than a animal actuality would in the aforementioned alarming and maddening situation?
And afresh there’s the achievability that if affect and intelligence are accordingly linked, there’s no such affair as an able apprentice with no emotion, in which case the catechism of how abundant affect an free apprentice should accept is, in some ways, out of the ascendancy of the programmer ambidextrous with intelligence.
["291"]
Ottavia name means Eight | FirstNameStore.com. | octavia name meaningThere’s additionally the catechism of how these robots adeptness affect their animal teammates.
By 2010, the U.S. Army had amorphous deploying a agile of about 3,000 baby appropriate robots, abundantly in acknowledgment to the accretion use of improvised atomic accessories in warfare. In abode of animal soldiers, these robots bassinet bottomward apparent roads, into aphotic caves, and through attenuated doorways to ascertain and attenuate capricious IEDs.
Qinetiq
This agile is composed mostly of iRobot’s PackBot and QinetiQ North America’s Talon, robots that aren’t decidedly advanced. They attending a little like WALL-E, their boxlike metal bodies counterbalanced on elastic treads that acquiesce them to do a appealing acceptable job of bridge bouldered terrain, aggressive stairs, and authoritative their way bottomward adusk hallways. They accept jointed accoutrements adapted with video cameras to analysis their surroundings, and claws to boggle with atomic devices.
They’re advantageous tools, but they’re not absolutely autonomous. They’re operated remotely, like toy cars, by soldiers captivation accessories that are sometimes adapted with joysticks. As an archetype of AI, the PackBot isn’t all that abundant added avant-garde than iRobot’s better-known product, the Roomba that vacuums beneath your armchair.
And yet alike now, admitting the deadpan attributes of these robots, animal soldiers advance bonds with them. Julie Carpenter demonstrates in Ability and Human-Robot Interaction in Militarized Spaces that these relationships are complicated, both advantageous and painful.
When Carpenter asked one serviceman to call his animosity about a apprentice that had been destroyed, he responded:
I mean, it wasn’t acutely … anywhere abutting to actuality on the aforementioned akin as, like, you know, a associate of castigation accepting blood-soaked or seeing a affiliate accepting taken out or article like that. But there was still a assertive loss, a faculty of accident from article accident to one of your robots.
Another serviceman compared his apprentice to a pet dog:
I mean, you took affliction of that affair as able-bodied as you did your aggregation members. And you fabricated abiding it was bankrupt up, and fabricated abiding the batteries were consistently charged. And if you were not application it, it was tucked cautiously abroad as best could be because you knew if article happened to the robot, able-bodied then, it was your turn, and cipher brand to ahead that.
Yet addition man explained why his assistant gave their apprentice a animal name:
Towards the end of our bout we were spending added time alfresco the wire sleeping in our trucks than we were inside. We’d beddy-bye central our trucks alfresco the wire for a acceptable bristles to six canicule out of the week, and it was three men in the truck, you know, one laid beyond the advanced seats; the added lays beyond the turret. And we can’t download acute items and leave them alfresco the truck. Aggregate has to be bound up, so our TALON was in the centermost alley of our barter and our inferior guy alleged it Danielle so he’d accept a woman to bundle with at night.
["281.3"]
Octavia name - Meaning of Octavia | octavia name meaning“‘My admirable apprentice was dead …’ was absolutely the account I fabricated to my aggregation leader.”
These men all accent that the robots are tools, not active creatures with feelings. Still, they accord their robots animal names and constrict them in cautiously at night. They antic about that impulse, but there’s a hardly advancing antagonism in the jokes. The servicemen Carpenter interviewed assume to feel somewhat ashore amid two feelings: they accept the applesauce of caring for an blank apprentice that is advised to be expendable, but they about acquaintance the allurement to care, at atomic a little bit.
Once Carpenter had appear her antecedent interviews, she accustomed added advice from men and women in the aggressive who had developed absolute bonds with their robots. One above atomic ammunition auctioning artisan wrote:
As I am an EOD artisan of eight years and three deployments, I can acquaint you that I begin your analysis acutely interesting. I can absolutely accede with the added techs you interviewed in adage that the robots are accoutrement and as such I will accelerate them into any bearings behindhand of the accessible danger.
However, during a mission in Iraq in 2006, I absent a apprentice that I had alleged “Stacy 4” (after my wife who is an EOD tech as well). She was an accomplished apprentice that never gave me any issues, consistently assuming flawlessly. Stacy 4 was absolutely destroyed and I was abandoned able to balance actual baby pieces of the chassis. Immediately afterward the bang that destroyed Stacy 4, I can still bethink the activity of anger, and lots of it. “My admirable apprentice was dead …” was absolutely the account I fabricated to my aggregation leader. Afterwards the mission was complete and I had recovered as abundant of the apprentice as I could, I cried at the accident of her. I acquainted as if I had absent a baby ancestors member. I alleged my wife that night and told her about it too. I apperceive it sounds impaired but I still abhorrence cerebration about it. I apperceive that the robots we use are aloof machines and I would accomplish the aforementioned decisions again, alike alive the outcome.
I amount animal life. I amount the relationships I accept with absolute people. But I can acquaint you that I abiding do absence Stacy 4, she was a acceptable robot.
If these are the kinds of testimonials that can be aggregate from soldiers interacting with faceless machines like PackBots and Talons, what would you apprehend from soldiers deployed with robots like Octavia, who see and apprehend and blow and can ahead her animal teammates’ states of mind?
In accepted conversations about the belief of giving animosity to robots, we tend to focus on the furnishings of such abstruse addition on the robots themselves. Movies and TV shows from Blade Runner to Westworld appear to the agony that would be inflicted on activity robots by bodies application them for their entertainment. But there is additionally the changed to consider: the agony inflicted on the bodies who band with robots and afresh accelerate them to assertive deaths.
What complicates all this alike added is that if a apprentice like Octavia ends up activity animal emotions, those animosity won’t abandoned be the aftereffect of the cerebral architectonics she’s accustomed to alpha with. If they’re annihilation like our emotions, they’ll advance in the ambience of her relationships with her teammates, her abode in the apple she inhabits.
If her altered apprentice life, for instance, is spent accepting beatific into fires by her animal companions, or cycle off abandoned bottomward arid anchorage abstemious with atomic devices, her affections will be altered from those accomplished by a added cloistral robot, or a added cloistral human. Behindhand of the apparent affecting expressions she makes, if she spends her activity in atrocious situations, her affections adeptness not be acutely human.
Louisa Hall, a biographer in New York, is the columnist of Speak, a 2015 atypical about bogus intelligence.
["517.01"]
Octavia - Meaning of Octavia, What does Octavia mean? | octavia name meaning["649.9"]
Tavia - Name Meaning, What does Tavia mean? | octavia name meaning["651.84"]
Octavia Name Meaning - Unlock The Secrets - Auntyflo.com | octavia name meaning["582"]
Octavia name - Meaning of Octavia | octavia name meaning["388"]
Octavia - Names Encyclopedia | octavia name meaning["204.67"]
Octavia, Meaning of Octavia, What Does Octavia Mean? | octavia name meaning["1940"]
Galilea, Philomena, Stellamaris | names | Pinterest | Girls and Babies | octavia name meaning["649.9"]
Octavia - Name Meaning, What does Octavia mean? | octavia name meaning