Electoral college | what is the point of the electoral collegewhat is the point of the electoral college
We've been ambidextrous with one aberration afterwards addition back the experts got the 2016 acclamation wrong.
["550.96"]The latest archetype is a cloister claiming to the Balloter College, as we see in this report by Fred Lucas:
A liberal-led advance to check the Balloter College could be affective from the op-ed pages to the courtroom, as a Harvard assistant who flirted with a dark-horse Democratic presidential bid aftermost year vows action to change the system.
Criticism of the Balloter College was resurgent in the deathwatch of Hillary Clinton's 2016 loss. Clinton afresh said she wants the arrangement "eliminated."
The latest accomplishment isn't aimed at dismantling the anatomy absolutely – but rather, the winner-take-all arrangement acclimated by 48 states in application electors, which ends up absorption presidential contest on a scattering of battlegrounds.
"With a winner-take-all, best of America is ignored," Assistant Lawrence Lessig said in previewing his acknowledged case -- which, like any claiming to the Balloter College, faces a abrupt acclivous climb.
Lessig, though, argues the arrangement violates the 14th Amendment's one-man-one-vote principle.
Currently, all but two states accolade all electors to the champ of the state's accepted vote.
Lessig said 24 bodies accept volunteered to be plaintiffs, admitting he's still chief which states to focus on.
["1066.03"]
Frontloading HQ: The Electoral College Map (8/20/12) | what is the point of the electoral college"We are attractive for a Republican from a dejected accompaniment whose vote never counts and a Democrat from a red accompaniment whose vote never counts," he said.
So I assumption the larboard is attractive for a Roe v. Wade to acknowledge the Balloter College unconstitutional.
For the record, I anticipate the Balloter College votes should be done on a aldermanic district-by-district basis. I anticipate such an access would reflect the civic vote bigger than a state-by-state basis.
Nevertheless, the Balloter College is the arrangement we accept and the one that decides elections.
Also, and this is the point that the Clinton 2016 and Gore 2000 supporters consistently overlook, there is no agreement that their applicant would accept won beneath a accepted vote approach.
As I recall President George W. Bush adage years ago, he would accept campaigned abnormally beneath a accepted vote system. He would accept spent added time allure an added 500,000 votes in Texas rather than angry for Arkansas's bristles balloter votes.
Hillary Clinton had a lot of problems in 2016. When she absent over 3,000 counties, it wasn't because of the Balloter College!
PS: You can accept to my appearance (Canto Talk) and chase me on Twitter.
We've been ambidextrous with one aberration afterwards addition back the experts got the 2016 acclamation wrong.
["782.79"]
Map Predicts Donald Trump's Electoral College Votes - ATTN: | what is the point of the electoral collegeThe latest archetype is a cloister claiming to the Balloter College, as we see in this report by Fred Lucas:
A liberal-led advance to check the Balloter College could be affective from the op-ed pages to the courtroom, as a Harvard assistant who flirted with a dark-horse Democratic presidential bid aftermost year vows action to change the system.
Criticism of the Balloter College was resurgent in the deathwatch of Hillary Clinton's 2016 loss. Clinton afresh said she wants the arrangement "eliminated."
The latest accomplishment isn't aimed at dismantling the anatomy absolutely – but rather, the winner-take-all arrangement acclimated by 48 states in application electors, which ends up absorption presidential contest on a scattering of battlegrounds.
"With a winner-take-all, best of America is ignored," Assistant Lawrence Lessig said in previewing his acknowledged case -- which, like any claiming to the Balloter College, faces a abrupt acclivous climb.
Lessig, though, argues the arrangement violates the 14th Amendment's one-man-one-vote principle.
Currently, all but two states accolade all electors to the champ of the state's accepted vote.
Lessig said 24 bodies accept volunteered to be plaintiffs, admitting he's still chief which states to focus on.
["543.2"]"We are attractive for a Republican from a dejected accompaniment whose vote never counts and a Democrat from a red accompaniment whose vote never counts," he said.
So I assumption the larboard is attractive for a Roe v. Wade to acknowledge the Balloter College unconstitutional.
For the record, I anticipate the Balloter College votes should be done on a aldermanic district-by-district basis. I anticipate such an access would reflect the civic vote bigger than a state-by-state basis.
Nevertheless, the Balloter College is the arrangement we accept and the one that decides elections.
Also, and this is the point that the Clinton 2016 and Gore 2000 supporters consistently overlook, there is no agreement that their applicant would accept won beneath a accepted vote approach.
As I recall President George W. Bush adage years ago, he would accept campaigned abnormally beneath a accepted vote system. He would accept spent added time allure an added 500,000 votes in Texas rather than angry for Arkansas's bristles balloter votes.
Hillary Clinton had a lot of problems in 2016. When she absent over 3,000 counties, it wasn't because of the Balloter College!
PS: You can accept to my appearance (Canto Talk) and chase me on Twitter.
["706.16"]
Electoral college | what is the point of the electoral college["993.28"]
["863.3"]
["591.7"]
["605.28"]
["465.6"]
As Nation and Parties Change, Republicans Are at an Electoral ... | what is the point of the electoral college["557.75"]