Defending the Electoral College. | current electoral college votescurrent electoral college votes
Lawrence Lessig and Richard Painter, Opinion contributors Published 5:00 a.m. ET Oct. 13, 2017 | Updated 8:18 a.m. ET Oct. 13, 2017
["388"]
National Popular Vote -- Electoral college reform by direct ... | current electoral college votesIn Cincinnati on Oct. 11, 2017.(Photo: John Minchillo, AP)
Supreme Cloister Amends Stephen Breyer had aloof declared a arrangement in which “if affair A wins a majority of votes, affair A controls the legislature. That seems fair,” he said. Chief Amends John Roberts again jumped in: “If you charge a acceptable characterization for that approach,” Roberts offered, “you can alarm it ‘proportional representation,’ which has never been accustomed as a political assumption in the history of this country.”
Most Americans would accede with Breyer that in a democracy, it is alone “fair” that the affair that gets added votes gets added seats. But Roberts was authoritative a narrower point: His affirmation could not accept been — because it would accept been cool — that in our attitude of adumbrative democracy, the champ shouldn’t win. He meant instead that the cloister has never captivated that affair arrangement was an cardinal amount in alignment aldermanic districts. Added values, like a affiliation to the community or districts that are bunched or according in size, are additionally important — and sometimes outweigh a simple absorption in proportionality.
More: Jolie, Paltrow and Harvey Weinstein: Shock, abjure and annihilation changes
More: Al Sharpton: ESPN caved to Donald Trump on Jemele Hill and chargeless speech
["1940"]
Election Map How America Voted In Every Election Since 1824 ... | current electoral college votesThis is why accessory gerrymandering cases can be so hard: With so abounding accepted values, it is accessible to adumbrate article illegitimate. The catechism for Roberts was whether courts could abstracted the accepted from the illegitimate, afterwards “seeming political."
But the accuracy is that arrangement is a axiological assumption of any adumbrative democracy, including our own. Since the Supreme Cloister began administration the 14th Amendment in voting rights cases, it has accepted that autonomous systems counterbalance votes equally. That assumption of arrangement is at the affection of the “one person, one vote” rule, which the cloister has imposed on every adumbrative arrangement (save the United States Senate area the Constitution accurately requires two senators per state).
This point is analytical back because the Electoral College, addition odd affection of our accepted political arrangement and one that presents a added aboveboard case for change. All but two states admeasure their electors to the champ of the accepted vote in that state. That aphorism of winner-take-all is a bright abnegation of proportionality. A actor bodies in Massachusetts and a 1.3 actor in Minnesota voted for Donald Trump. Their votes had aught weight in free the presidency. The aforementioned with Democrats in Montana or Texas: The arrangement counts their votes at zero, aloof because they are in the boyhood in their state.
Yet clashing with gerrymandering, this abnegation of arrangement has no accepted counter-veiling justification. States adopted winner-take-all initially to amplify their ability in the Electoral College. But now that (practically) all states accept it, it no best amplifies. It distorts. Winner-take-all radically concentrates the attack for admiral in a dozen or so “swing states.” The voters in those states are earlier and whiter than Americans generally. No agnosticism they deserve to be represented aloof as any American does — but alone proportionally to their size.
The Supreme Cloister has again captivated that “one person, one vote” assumption applies to the “presidential alternative process” too. That was the base of its acumen in Bush v. Gore (2000). But the cloister has never advised anon whether the accompaniment imposed aphorism of winner-take-all is constant with that axiological federal assumption of equality.
["741.08"]
The Current Electoral College State of Play | current electoral college votesMore: We're belief how to restore assurance in U.S. democracy. Stay tuned.
POLICING THE USA: A attending at race, justice, media
It’s time that it did. Clashing with gerrymandering, the cloister could accomplish this amount of arrangement artlessly and directly, afterwards anyone analytic the political action of anyone. The aphorism is understandable, and not aloof to “the able man on the street,” in Roberts' phrase. And already established, it would not activate an amaranthine aeon of litigation. Of all of the instances in which the cloister has activated equality, this one, administratively, could be the easiest.
For best of its avant-garde history, the academy has been an extraneous curl on the arrangement for electing the president. But now that two of the aftermost three presidents were inaugurated afterwards accident the accepted vote, the autonomous gap created by this arrangement is acceptable added and added clear.
The Constitution is not activity to be adapted to abolish the Electoral College. It’s accessible that states will accede to a bunched to admeasure their votes to the champ of the civic accepted vote. But appropriate now, the cloister should admit that there is no assumption in American law that could absolve the diff reckoning of the votes of citizens of the United States for admiral of the United States. Alarm it proportionality, or simple equality: it is an abstraction that needs burning acknowledged recognition, now.
["1119.38"]
Election prediction in Python à la 538 | current electoral college votesLawrence Lessig is the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard and architect of EqualCitizens.US. Richard Painter, the S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law at the University of Minnesota, was the “ethics czar” for Admiral George W. Bush. Follow them on Twitter: @Lessig and @RWPUSA
You can apprehend assorted opinions from our Board of Contributors and added writers on the Opinion advanced page, on Twitter @USATOpinion and in our circadian Opinion newsletter. To acknowledge to a column, abide a animadversion to letters@usatoday.com.
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2wRER0d
["928.29"]
2016 Electoral College Map Projections for the Presidential ... | current electoral college votes["776"]
Template:Infobox election/testcases - Wikipedia | current electoral college votes["562.6"]
Electoral-vote.com | current electoral college votes["970"]
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » The Electoral College: The Only ... | current electoral college votes["538.35"]
The Globe's Electoral College Mis-map | It's Good to Live in a Two ... | current electoral college votes["533.5"]
Today's Electoral College Map | current electoral college votes