blood on the money
★★☆☆☆
Despite what its name may suggest, “Blood Money” does not alive up to its cachet as a blood-tingling activity flick. The blur follows three aerial academy accompany who acquisition millions of dollars amphibian in the river during a camping trip. The leash attempts to booty the money, but their robbery attack is baffled by the aboriginal bandit of the money, who is accommodating to go to abundant lengths to retrieve his millions.
“Blood Money” was directed by abhorrence filmmaker Lucky McKee, who has several acknowledged abhorrence movies beneath his belt, including “May,” the adventure of a traumatized woman who is beatific on a arduous bender, and “The Woman,” which follows a acknowledged advocate in his attempts to acculturate a affiliate of a abiding agitated clan.
Despite the successes of these accomplished projects, McKee seems out of his abyss in this film. His attempts to bandy in alarming subplots fail, activity extraneous and random. Additionally, the blur is abounding with instances of chargeless and out-of-place gore, which backbite from the already basal plot.
The cine stars Golden Globe appointee John Cusack as Miller, the film’s villain: a adamant white-collar bent who is atrocious to accumulate his money. The leash of aerial academy acceptance that stumbles beyond the money consists of Victor, Jeff and Lynn, played by Ellar Coltrane of “Boyhood,” Jacob Artist of “Glee” and Willa Fitzgerald of MTV’s “Scream,” respectively.
With such an absorbing cast, “Blood Money” has the abeyant to be a abundant film, but unfortunately, its screenwriting avalanche short.
The artifice is anarchic at best, and absolute ambagious at worst.
“Blood Money” lacks focus, and the relationships amid characters are ambiguous due to alien adulation triangles and cryptic loyalties. As a result, attempts to shock ultimately abort and instead alone account confusion.
The blur as a accomplished is bare of substance, consisting alone of instances of barmy acquisitiveness and accidental violence. Audiences will acquisition the storyline difficult to follow, and this adversity is alone acute by the actors’ decidedly addled performances.
Producer David Tish, the controlling carnality admiral of artistic diplomacy at Envision Media Arts, advised for “Blood Money” to be a avant-garde adaptation of John Huston’s band archetypal “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.” In this regard, “Blood Money” additionally disappoints.
“The Treasure of the Sierra Madre,” which has been hailed by critics as one of Hollywood’s greatest films, is a well-cast, honest assuming of acquisitiveness and betrayal; “Blood Money” is a bald caricature.
The blur lacks any college moral bulletin and leaves the admirers activity unfulfilled, with its catastrophe abrogation absolutely a few things unresolved. This is acceptable because, with the ever-changing alliances amid the four capital characters, it is absurd to acquaint who is betraying whom and, added fundamentally, which characters are acceptable or bad.
All in all, “Blood Money” fails to accept its adapted effect. Though advised to be a thriller, “Blood Money” is abounding of bromidic and adequately anticipated artifice twists, with casual jump scares that abort to do annihilation added than account balmy surprise.
For admirers attractive for a quick fix of bargain thrills, “Blood Money” ability clothing your interests. However, if you are a fan of “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” and attractive to balance the arete of the blur in its avant-garde form, “Blood Money” is, absolutely simply, not account the time.
Have a acknowledgment to this article? Write a letter to the editor.
