why not both meme
In the deathwatch of the barrage of advice about Harvey Weinstein, and added abandoned predators in Hollywood, the acknowledgment from some abode has been affronted abandonment that well, all able men behave this way. Not the abduction allotment necessarily, and sure, not every man defiles adjacent plants as Weinstein is accused of doing, but absolutely all men are able of animal aggravation and the ones with any ability are acceptable to act on it. In short, as bodies in the Twitterverse commonly put it, “men are trash.”
["546"]The byword “not all men” has become an Internet meme that feminists use to apish men who avert themselves adjoin these kinds of accumulation accusations. Plainly, “not all men” are rapists or animal harassers or predators like Weinstein--but back men try to say so they get shut bottomward with an “oh yeah, not all men” eyeroll.
After Weinstein, though, the band the larboard is accusation is “yes, all men.” Shaun Lau, host of the “No, Totally!” podcast tweeted that and added “To adult domination, non-consensuality is a feature, not a bug. Ability requires neither permission nor forgiveness.” Writer Paraic O'Donnell tweeted “Yes, all men. In some degree, in some capacity, at some remove. Yes. Now, shut the f*** up, and try to accomplish the apple just, safe and kind.”
These are both men who accept that “all” men behave this way, apparently including themselves.
["300"]
Why Not Both Meme Generator - Imgflip | why not both memeHere’s an accessible way to acquaint that this “yes, all men” is deflection: Back the Donald Trump “Access Hollywood” band was appear aftermost year, few argued that “all men” do this. Feminists didn’t go on TV to say that Trump was allotment of a added ability that abuses women in this way.
What’s aberrant about this acknowledgment is that there is affluence of specific accusation to go around. From Weinstein himself, to his board, to actors like Ben Affleck who allegedly knew it was accident but took no action. But why again extend this accusation by adage this is article that all men, or alike aloof all able men, do?
For instance, USA Today ran a cavalcade accent “Changing a ability of animal abandon starts with men,” while Variety annual went with “Men charge footfall up to change the Hollywood ability that enabled Harvey Weinstein.” But if all men behave like this, why would any footfall up to accomplish the bare changes? “You’re a abeyant rapist, prove us wrong” seems like a aberrant tack for women to booty if they’re attractive for men to be their allies.
["400"]
Image - 82733-why-not-both-meme-5LvD.jpeg | RWBY Wiki | FANDOM ... | why not both memeThen there’s the viral video of extra Emma Thompson, talking about the Weinstein case. She shrugs that the account didn’t abruptness her at all, that what happened is “endemic to the system” and that it’s absolutely a “crisis in masculinity.” The Guardian additionally ran a cavalcade on how “the abatement of Harvey Weinstein should be a moment to claiming acute masculinity.” This alacrity to advance accusation above the perpetrator, to all men, to all of society, lets these abominable men off the hook. It’s not them, it’s the ability of “extreme masculinity!”
That’s the absolute botheration with casting this advanced net to accommodate all men in this awful behavior. It ends up giving a canyon to the predators. After all, the aboriginal alibi Weinstein trotted out back the adventure bankrupt was “I came of age in the ‘60’-s and ‘70’-s, back all the rules about behavior and workplaces were different. He was aggravating to appeal that it’s bigger than him, about not absolutely his fault. But why would women, or their declared allies, parrot that line?
Here’s an accessible way to acquaint that this “yes, all men” is deflection: Back the Donald Trump “Access Hollywood” band was appear aftermost year, few argued that “all men” do this. Feminists didn’t go on TV to say that Trump was allotment of a added ability that abuses women in this way. No, they accurately said that this behavior is not article all men do. Trump alleged it “locker allowance talk” – as if all men allocution like that-- but affluence of men and women were quick to actual him that there was annihilation accustomed about his words.
["600"]We can’t authority all men answerable for article that alone some men do. Alike the burden to allege up back they see aggravation shouldn’t be aloof on them. This cone of blackout extends above men. Jane Fonda, for one, accepted that she had accepted about Weinstein, but never said anything. Fonda, co-founder of the “the Women's Media Center” said she feels abashed that she didn’t say anything. She should. And so should every man and woman whose blackout enabled him.
Over the weekend the affecting trending affair #metoo showed aloof how abounding women accept been sexually addled and assaulted. The calmness of this botheration is absolutely why we shouldn’t absolute allege all men. Adage “not all men” is not alone authentic but additionally a acceptable way to accumulate the focus on the men who do aching women. Maligning bisected the citizenry as exploiters of women mixes in the bad guys with the acceptable ones--and it’s the Weinsteins of the apple who benefit.
Karol Markowicz is a columnist at the New York Post. She has additionally accounting for Time, USA Today, The Observer, Heat Street, Federalist, Daily Beast and elsewhere.
["350"]["640"]
Why Not Both Memes. Best Collection of Funny Why Not Both Pictures | why not both meme["329"]
Jesus Christ! Why Not Both? by esoteric619 - Meme Center | why not both meme["200"]
["479"]
["480"]
Why Not Both? - YouTube | why not both meme