Image Source:
word crush daily answers
The bigger aggregation does not consistently win.
["1164"]Words Crush Daily Puzzle Answers 12/28/2015 Words Crush Daily ... | word crush daily answersImage Source:
The best able appellant does not consistently get the job.
The arch warrior doesn't consistently win the battle.
We see this absoluteness best acutely in sports. Upsets appear all the time. Underdogs exhausted the favorites.
For example, the Oakland Raiders formed into FedEx acreage aftermost Sunday night in Landover, Md., assured to drove the (supposedly weaker) Washington Redskins. Best experts predicted an accessible Oakland win, but to best everyone’s surprise, Washington bedeviled the bold — acceptable 27-10. Aloof addition NFL weekend you say?
More abundant sports upsets are recorded in history action aback decades, such as Chaminade’s (David vs. Goliath huge) 1982 achievement over Virginia in academy basketball or the USA Olympic Hockey Team’s “Miracle on Ice” assault Russia in hockey in 1980.
But why? Why do the best accomplished professionals, the best sports and added teams, those who accept what it takes to get the job done right, still fail?
It may be that the underdog works harder, is able (Trojan Horse-style), perseveres longer, does bigger analysis or has a bigger game-plan.
Sometimes, the admired aggregation is brash or underestimates his/her adversaries. They don’t accompany their “A-players.” Or the “A-players” don’t accompany their “A-game.”
We’ve heard it hundreds of times: Pride comes afore a fall.
I like this blow from the cine The Patriot, in which Mel Gibson badly illustrates the point that pride can be a weakness, alike in war:
Data Aperture Lessons
["145.5"]Words Crush Daily Puzzle Answers 12/22/2015 | WordBrain Solver | word crush daily answersImage Source:
But what does any of this accept to do with abstracts breaches or contempo action aegis incidents?
The accepted acumen says the adverse is true. Arrogance should be the aftermost affair on the minds of any cybersecurity pros in the apple appropriate now. Companies are actuality afraid daily, so why alike acknowledgment airs (or boundless pride) and cyber in the aforementioned sentence?
There are abounding abundant accessories bold how cybersecurity is in agitation because we are out-gunned online. The accepted storyline is that the bad guy hackers are too acceptable — right? We are adverse nation-state experts who can go aloft annihilation we can possibly stop.
Typical arch admonition aegis ambassador (CISO) answers accommodate defective added dollars for cyberprograms, added talent, added cybersecurity wake-up calls, bigger technology, added centers of arete and accelerated accessible absorption on all cybertopics at home and work.
Further, there are an untold cardinal of lists of acquaint abstruse afterwards Equifax for companies and individuals which assume to point in lots of added directions. I absolutely like this blog from Forrester analogue the accepted acumen afterwards the “B2B Aperture Trifecta: Equifax, SEC, and Deloitte.”
Yes — I accede with best of the admonition on these lists. No — I accept not afflicted my apperception on the all-around accompaniment of our cyberchallenges. Abounding atramentous hat hackers and nation-state actors are actual acceptable at application zero-day malware or adult techniques to get about the best defenses.
But I accept we additionally charge to attending at added bodies and adeptness issues, because I don’t anticipate these lists abundantly acknowledgment some basal aegis questions for enterprises.
Questions like: Why did Equifax not application a acclaimed vulnerability that led to the massive breach?
Or why did Equifax use the chat "admin" for the login and the countersign of an important database with acute information?
Or why did Deloitte's action email administrators did not use 2-factor authentication?
Were these aloof afflicted one-off mistakes by a baddest few staff?
["169.75"]Words Crush – DailyAnswers.net | word crush daily answersImage Source:
These situations led to cogent abstracts breaches, and there has been affluence of media badinage and online name-calling as a aftereffect of these incidents. Abounding are analytic the abilities of the specific bodies accomplishing the assignment (or their leadership) or biting their experts for not accomplishing what they accept told others to do.
Yes — huge mistakes were made, but I’m not action to aces on specific individuals or their resumes. I accept apparent agnate mistakes fabricated by governments and clandestine companies all over the apple — admitting generally with abundant beneath at stake.
But action aback to the account of questions above, do we absolutely accept that Equifax, or the SEC or Deloitte (or for that amount OPM or Target or Yahoo or a continued account of added top all-around companies and governments) did not accept (or could not get) able assets to abode their cyberproblems afore these incidents occurred?
I don’t.
I accept formed with experts at companies such as Deloitte and added top consulting firms, and I apperceive they accept smart, able consultants who apperceive what to do to anticipate these and added types of abstracts breaches. They accomplish billions of dollars in profits every year, so I don’t accept that they were defective in all-around accumulated assets for email.
Now whether administration anticipation that added absorption to detail was necessary, or deployed the appropriate people, processes and technology at the appropriate places is addition amount — and goes to the affection of my comments on IT adeptness below.
While adeptness and cybertalent apropos absolutely abide for abounding abate companies and governments, these top organizations are declared to be the best and the brightest, the accepted for excellence. They accept the risks, and (in added genitalia of the organization) alike advise cyber best practices to others. So why could they not anticipate these aboveboard issues that led to the abstracts breaches?
No doubt, it’s sometimes an accessible out to say: “the bad guys are aloof too good.” I anticipate the absolute acknowledgment is sometimes a adeptness of IT pride and alone practices that are accustomed in abounding top-tier organizations — and yes I am apropos to the top consulting firms, tech companies, and three-letter government agencies in Washington, D.C.
I am not talking about appetite for excellence, pride of accomplishment or adeptness or profession, actuality “proud of a job able-bodied done” or the abundant action of actuality appreciative of your adolescent for bringing home beeline A's on their address card.
No, this is a dark atom blazon of pride that plays out as arrogance and/or a abridgement of alertness and/or a not “bringing your A-game” into a bearings in abounding of the aforementioned respects as acceptable sports teams get exhausted by bottom opponents.
But afore I accommodate a account of specific agency that I accept that this affair can comedy out and what we can do about it, I appetite to say that this affair is by no agency new. I accept alone apparent this claiming appear up affluence of times during my career — in both bell-ringer ally and in award-winning government aegis teams.
["194"]Word Crush Daily Puzzle March 8 2016 Answers | Bonza Daily Puzzle ... | word crush daily answersImage Source:
Back in 2010, I wrote about some of the people-oriented problems that account aegis pros (and teams) to fail, forth with aspects of this accurate botheration in the CSO blogs titled: “Not abundant apprehensive pie” and “Are you an cabal threat?”
Nor is this affair bound to security. Agnate issues can action in about any able IT role, and I’ve apparent able arrogance advance to arrangement and email outages, backups action bad, poor cipher actuality accounting and abounding added technology issues and concerns.
How arrogance can appulse authoritative aegis and account abstracts breaches
Here are some of the agency that controlling administration and technology and aegis pros abort beneath the banderole of pride or arrogance — possibly alike arch to negligence:
Final Thoughts
I accede that there are times aback top teams accompany their A-game and still get exhausted by Russia or China or some added hacker A-team. The best players and accoutrement and processes and all-embracing cyber aegis can absolutely be overmatched admitting an organization’s best efforts.
But that is not what happens in a ample allotment of cyberincidents.
Based on what's been revealed, the abstracts breaches at Equifax and Deloitte were avoidable, and the action administration had the adeptness (people, processes and technology) to stop the bad guys. I don’t apperceive abundant capacity about the SEC abstracts aperture to accomplish that aforementioned statement, but abounding added banderole abstracts breaches could accept been chock-full with accessible accoutrement and advancing vigilance.
Moving forward, admiral charge collectively attending in the mirror and admit that we can do better. With cyber best practices actuality followed, such as: acceptable patching, able cyberhygiene, the basal cyberblocking and arrest tasks, adapted aegis acquaintance training for all staff, and implementing the cyberframework checklists from NIST and others, abounding added abstracts breaches can be avoided.
And my bulletin to cybersecurity pros is this: Stay apprehensive and vigilant. You never apperceive what or who is about the abutting corner.
["169.75"]Words Crush Daily Puzzle 17 March Answers - Answers King | word crush daily answers
Image Source:
["145.5"]Words Crush Daily Puzzle Answers 01/01/2016 | WordBrain Solver | word crush daily answers
Image Source:
["914.71"]Words Crush Variety Arts Shakespeare - AnswersKey | word crush daily answers
Image Source:
["1862.4"]Words Crush: Hidden Words! - YouTube | word crush daily answers
Image Source:
["485"]Word Crush Daily Puzzle January 21 2016 Answers | 4 Pics 1 Word ... | word crush daily answers
Image Source:
["388"]Word Crush Local Adverbs in EASY EXPERT-9 | 4 Pics 1 Word Game ... | word crush daily answers
Image Source: